Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum vs Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum

8.3/10 Very Good

4.2★ (3,800 owners)

120W digital motor, 55 min, 0.7L, multi-floor head. Turkish engineering at UK value price.

Full Review

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,600 owners)

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum	Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.3/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.2★ (3,800)	4.3★ (5,600)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	55 minutes	65 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.3/10. Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry. That said, the Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 120W digital motor, 55 min, 0.7L, multi-floor head. Turkish engineering at UK value price. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum

Under £150 — the most affordable dedicated cordless vacuum from a major European appliance brand
55-minute runtime above average for the budget bracket
Multi-floor head adjusts automatically between carpet and hard floors
Beko's European appliance engineering heritage from over 60 years in the industry
Anti-twist brush roll reduces manual maintenance frequency

0.7L bin requires frequent emptying during large cleaning sessions
120W digital motor trails premium alternatives significantly on suction
Beko brand less associated with vacuums than their washing machine and fridge expertise

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

360° suction nozzle reaches all corners and edges without attachment changes
Wet mop pad attaches to base for simultaneous vacuuming and mopping
65-minute runtime is above average for a combined wet-dry cordless
PowerCyclone 8 technology maintains suction as the bin fills
Philips' appliance engineering heritage applied to wet-dry cordless format

Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use
Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro
Philips cordless range less marketed in UK than Dyson or Shark

FAQ

Which is better, Beko PowerClean Pro or Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua?

Is the Beko PowerClean Pro worth the extra cost?

The Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Beko PowerClean Pro best suited to?

120W digital motor, 55 min, 0.7L, multi-floor head. Turkish engineering at UK value price.

Who is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua best suited to?

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

What are the main downsides of each?

Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum: 0.7L bin requires frequent emptying during large cleaning sessions; 120W digital motor trails premium alternatives significantly on suction. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use; Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Beko PowerClean Pro Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.2★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.