AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

8.9/10 Great

4.4★ (3,800 owners)

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (3,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10. 18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

HEPA H13 filtration with fully-sealed allergy-safe emptying — dust stays in system until binned
ErgoFlex wand bends 30° for under-sofa cleaning without stooping
A++ energy rating — the most efficient motor design in any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes comfortably
AEG / Electrolux Group engineering heritage in home appliances since 1887

AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark
Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing
Allergy-safe emptying is slower than standard bin release

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless worth the extra cost?

Yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless best suited to?

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy: AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark; Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy sits at 4.4★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.