AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy vs Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

8.9/10 Great

4.4★ (3,800 owners)

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Full Review

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

8.4/10 Very Good

4.3★ (3,600 owners)

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy	Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.4/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (3,800)	4.3★ (3,600)
Verdict	Great	Very Good
Filter	HEPA H13 sealed	HEPA H12
Runtime	60 minutes	40 min stick + 45 min handheld

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10. 18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy. That said, the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless is worth considering if Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

HEPA H13 filtration with fully-sealed allergy-safe emptying — dust stays in system until binned
ErgoFlex wand bends 30° for under-sofa cleaning without stooping
A++ energy rating — the most efficient motor design in any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes comfortably
AEG / Electrolux Group engineering heritage in home appliances since 1887

AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark
Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing
Allergy-safe emptying is slower than standard bin release

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

Detaches into a handheld vacuum for cars, stairs and upholstery independently
HEPA H12 filtration — Henry's commercial-grade filtration in a cordless format
Numatic's commercial build quality — their corded vacuums last 15+ years in offices
40-minute stick + 45-minute handheld runtime from two separate charges
UK-manufactured Numatic quality control behind the cheerful red face

Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
Handheld mode range is shorter than stick mode for continuous use

FAQ

Which is better, AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless or Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1?

Is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless worth the extra cost?

Yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10.

Who is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless best suited to?

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Who is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 best suited to?

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy: AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark; Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing. Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless: Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy sits at 4.4★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless at 4.3★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.