AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy vs Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

8.9/10 Great

4.4★ (3,800 owners)

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Full Review

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.4/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (3,800)	4.4★ (4,800)
Verdict	Great	Very Good
Filter	HEPA H13 sealed	HEPA
Runtime	60 minutes	40 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10. 18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy

HEPA H13 filtration with fully-sealed allergy-safe emptying — dust stays in system until binned
ErgoFlex wand bends 30° for under-sofa cleaning without stooping
A++ energy rating — the most efficient motor design in any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes comfortably
AEG / Electrolux Group engineering heritage in home appliances since 1887

AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark
Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing
Allergy-safe emptying is slower than standard bin release

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

FAQ

Which is better, AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless or Henry Cordless HVB160?

Is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless worth the extra cost?

Yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10.

Who is the AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless best suited to?

18V, 60 min, A++ energy, HEPA H13, ErgoFlex, allergy-safe emptying. Swedish engineering for allergy.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

What are the main downsides of each?

AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy: AEG brand less visible in UK cordless market vs Dyson or Shark; Less suction power than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing. Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — AEG QX9-1-ALIN Cordless Vacuum Allergy sits at 4.4★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum at 4.4★ from 4,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.