Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (3,600 owners)

27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder.

Full Review

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED	Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (3,600)	4.5★ (6,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Panel	4K Mini-LED	QLED
Refresh	144Hz	240Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10. 49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide. That said, the Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED is worth considering if 27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED

4K 144Hz Mini-LED delivers HDR brightness that standard 4K IPS cannot approach
USB-C 90W charges MacBook Pro or Dell XPS with single cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox 4K/120Hz at the same time as PC connection
Ambiglow projects screen colours onto the wall for peripheral immersion
Under £500 for 4K Mini-LED 144Hz — better value than ASUS ProArt or Samsung Neo at this spec

Mini-LED blooming visible in dark scenes with bright elements — OLED avoids this entirely
27-inch 4K pixel density is excellent but the panel is smaller than 32-inch alternatives
Ambiglow RGB behind monitor divides opinion aesthetically

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

49-inch 32:9 super ultrawide equals two 27-inch QHD monitors side by side with no bezel gap
1000R aggressive curve wraps the display around your field of view for total immersion
240Hz at 5120x1440 delivers smooth high-refresh gaming across the vast canvas
QLED quantum dot colour with 1000 nits peak brightness for vivid HDR
Replaces a dual-monitor setup for productivity with seamless single-screen workflow

£1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz
Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk
Not all games support 32:9 aspect ratio natively

FAQ

Which is better, Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K or Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch?

Is the Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K worth the extra cost?

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K best suited to?

27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder.

Who is the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch best suited to?

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED: Mini-LED blooming visible in dark scenes with bright elements — OLED avoids this entirely; 27-inch 4K pixel density is excellent but the panel is smaller than 32-inch alternatives. Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide: £1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz; Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED sits at 4.4★ from 3,600 verified Amazon owners, and Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide at 4.5★ from 6,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.