MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz vs ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (3,400 owners)

24" 1080p 240Hz IPS, 0.5ms MPRT, G-Sync Compatible, BackLightBoost. Budget 240Hz esports.

Full Review

At a Glance

	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz	ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (2,200)	4.5★ (3,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Size	32-inch 4K	24" FHD
Refresh	240Hz	240Hz
Response	0.03ms	0.5ms MPRT

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor is worth considering if 24" 1080p 240Hz IPS, 0.5ms MPRT, G-Sync Compatible, BackLightBoost. Budget 240Hz esports. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor

240Hz at 1080p 24-inch — the esports sweet spot at under £200
BackLightBoost reduces motion blur at high framerates for sharper fast-moving targets
G-Sync Compatible with FreeSync Premium for tear-free gaming on both GPU brands
IPS panel maintains colour accuracy alongside competitive speed
Under £200 for 240Hz — most accessible 240Hz gaming monitor reviewed

1080p in 2026 — 1440p at this refresh rate is more future-proof
24-inch 1080p shows pixels at closer viewing distances vs 1440p alternatives
HDR400 is the minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance

FAQ

Which is better, MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED or ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz?

Is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED worth the extra cost?

Yes — MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Who is the ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz best suited to?

24" 1080p 240Hz IPS, 0.5ms MPRT, G-Sync Compatible, BackLightBoost. Budget 240Hz esports.

What are the main downsides of each?

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods. ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor: 1080p in 2026 — 1440p at this refresh rate is more future-proof; 24-inch 1080p shows pixels at closer viewing distances vs 1440p alternatives.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz sits at 4.6★ from 2,200 verified Amazon owners, and ViewSonic XG2431 24-inch 240Hz Esports Monitor at 4.5★ from 3,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.