LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz

9.0/10 Excellent

4.6★ (6,800 owners)

34" 21:9 1440p 160Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible, HDR10. Best-value IPS ultrawide.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (6,800)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Size	34" 21:9	32-inch 4K
Panel	Nano IPS	QD-OLED
Refresh	160Hz	240Hz
Colour	98% DCI-P3	99% DCI-P3

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz is worth considering if 34" 21:9 1440p 160Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible, HDR10. Best-value IPS ultrawide. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz

IPS Nano 160Hz at 34-inch — the best-value ultrawide gaming monitor with IPS accuracy
Nano IPS achieves 98% DCI-P3 alongside 160Hz speed — colour and performance
G-Sync Compatible and FreeSync Premium for both GPU brands
HDR10 support for compatible content
Under £400 — accessible ultrawide gaming from LG's proven UltraGear IPS quality

IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than QD-OLED alternatives for atmospheric gaming
160Hz trails QD-OLED at 165Hz+ — marginal at this format
1ms GtG is the IPS standard — not the 0.1ms of OLED alternatives

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch best suited to?

34" 21:9 1440p 160Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible, HDR10. Best-value IPS ultrawide.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz: IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than QD-OLED alternatives for atmospheric gaming; 160Hz trails QD-OLED at 165Hz+ — marginal at this format. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B 34-inch Ultrawide 160Hz sits at 4.6★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.