LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor vs Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (3,600 owners)

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

Full Review

Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (2,800 owners)

27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor	Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (3,600)	4.4★ (2,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Refresh	240Hz	240Hz
Panel	Nano IPS	Mini-LED
Colour	98% DCI-P3	97% DCI-P3

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor: 32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming. Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED: 27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

32-inch 1440p provides more immersive single-player experience than 27-inch alternatives
Nano IPS technology achieves 98% DCI-P3 at 240Hz — colour and speed simultaneously
240Hz on a 32-inch panel — maximising both size and refresh rate
G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro for both GPU brands
LG's monitor engineering heritage across professional and gaming displays

32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances
Larger footprint requires more desk space
VESA mount arm required if using desk space efficiently at 32-inch

Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED

Mini-LED backlight delivers 1400 nits peak brightness — genuine HDR performance unlike LCD alternatives
576 local dimming zones create near-OLED contrast without OLED burn-in risk
Ambiglow projects matching colours onto the wall behind the monitor for immersive gaming environments
97% DCI-P3 colour accuracy covers professional creative work alongside gaming
240Hz makes it one of the fastest Mini-LED gaming monitors available

Mini-LED backlight blooming visible on very dark scenes with bright elements
1400 nit brightness is eye-fatiguing in dark room gaming at full HDR settings
Price premium over IPS alternatives for the Mini-LED backlight technology

FAQ

Which is better, LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch or Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz?

Is the LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch worth the extra cost?

The Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch best suited to?

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

Who is the Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz best suited to?

27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor: 32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances; Larger footprint requires more desk space. Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED: Mini-LED backlight blooming visible on very dark scenes with bright elements; 1400 nit brightness is eye-fatiguing in dark room gaming at full HDR settings.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 3,600 verified Amazon owners, and Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED at 4.4★ from 2,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.