LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (5,600 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (5,600)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Refresh	165Hz	240Hz
Panel	IPS	QD-OLED
Response	1ms	0.03ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz is worth considering if 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

Under £200 — most affordable 27-inch 1440p 165Hz IPS gaming monitor reviewed
1ms GtG response competitive with premium alternatives at fraction of the cost
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections for versatile room placement
FreeSync Premium for tear-free gaming on AMD GPUs
LG's display engineering at the most accessible gaming monitor price point

HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh
HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance
Fewer features than LG 27GP850B-B at the same brand but lower price tier

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz: HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh; HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz sits at 4.5★ from 5,600 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.