LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz

9.2/10 Excellent

4.7★ (8,400 owners)

27" 1440p Nano IPS 180Hz, 1ms, G-Sync + FreeSync, 98% DCI-P3, HDR. The 1440p sweet spot.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	9.2/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.7★ (8,400)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Size	27" 1440p	32-inch 4K
Panel	Nano IPS	QD-OLED
Refresh	180Hz	240Hz
Colour	98% DCI-P3	99% DCI-P3

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.2/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz is worth considering if 27" 1440p Nano IPS 180Hz, 1ms, G-Sync + FreeSync, 98% DCI-P3, HDR. The 1440p sweet spot. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz

Nano IPS achieves 98% DCI-P3 colour alongside 180Hz speed — colour and performance together
180Hz overclock provides extra smoothness over standard 165Hz panels
Both G-Sync Compatible and FreeSync Premium for any GPU brand
1ms GtG response with no significant ghosting
8,400 reviews at 4.7★ — the community's favourite 1440p gaming monitor

IPS contrast lower than VA or OLED for dark-scene atmosphere
HDR is HDR400 tier — not genuine HDR brightness
27-inch 1440p is the sweet spot but not the largest or sharpest option

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1440p Nano IPS 180Hz, 1ms, G-Sync + FreeSync, 98% DCI-P3, HDR. The 1440p sweet spot.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz: IPS contrast lower than VA or OLED for dark-scene atmosphere; HDR is HDR400 tier — not genuine HDR brightness. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — LG UltraGear 27GP850-B 27-inch 1440p 180Hz sits at 4.7★ from 8,400 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.