INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor	Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (1,800)	4.5★ (6,800)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Panel	4K OLED	QLED
Size	27-inch	49" 32:9 5120x1440
Refresh	160Hz	240Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.2/10 vs 8.9/10. 49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide. That said, the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

49-inch 32:9 super ultrawide equals two 27-inch QHD monitors side by side with no bezel gap
1000R aggressive curve wraps the display around your field of view for total immersion
240Hz at 5120x1440 delivers smooth high-refresh gaming across the vast canvas
QLED quantum dot colour with 1000 nits peak brightness for vivid HDR
Replaces a dual-monitor setup for productivity with seamless single-screen workflow

£1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz
Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk
Not all games support 32:9 aspect ratio natively

FAQ

Which is better, INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED or Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch?

Is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED worth the extra cost?

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Who is the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch best suited to?

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels. Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide: £1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz; Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor sits at 4.3★ from 1,800 verified Amazon owners, and Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide at 4.5★ from 6,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.