INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor vs MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (2,800 owners)

27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor	MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (1,800)	4.5★ (2,800)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Panel	4K OLED	IPS
Refresh	160Hz	144Hz
Response	0.03ms	1ms

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

4K resolution at 27-inch — the sharpest pixel density of any reviewed gaming monitor
144Hz at 4K is achievable on RTX 4080/4090 or RX 7900 XTX level GPUs
HDMI 2.1 enables 4K/144Hz from PlayStation 5 — the only console that benefits from 4K 144Hz
1ms GtG response time competitive with 1440p alternatives
MSI's gaming monitor value positioning vs Dell, ASUS ROG and Samsung premium branding

4K at 144Hz requires GPU investment of £600+ — the monitor demands matching hardware
144Hz at 4K is the minimum premium tier — OLED alternatives offer better contrast

FAQ

Which is better, INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED or MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz?

Is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Who is the MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels. MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 4K at 144Hz requires GPU investment of £600+ — the monitor demands matching hardware; 144Hz at 4K is the minimum premium tier — OLED alternatives offer better contrast.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor sits at 4.3★ from 1,800 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor at 4.5★ from 2,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.