INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor vs LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (3,600 owners)

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor	LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (1,800)	4.5★ (3,600)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Panel	4K OLED	Nano IPS
Size	27-inch	32" 1440p
Refresh	160Hz	240Hz
Response	0.03ms	1ms

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor: 32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

32-inch 1440p provides more immersive single-player experience than 27-inch alternatives
Nano IPS technology achieves 98% DCI-P3 at 240Hz — colour and speed simultaneously
240Hz on a 32-inch panel — maximising both size and refresh rate
G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro for both GPU brands
LG's monitor engineering heritage across professional and gaming displays

32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances
Larger footprint requires more desk space
VESA mount arm required if using desk space efficiently at 32-inch

FAQ

Which is better, INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED or LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch?

Is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED worth the extra cost?

The LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Who is the LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch best suited to?

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels. LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor: 32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances; Larger footprint requires more desk space.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor sits at 4.3★ from 1,800 verified Amazon owners, and LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor at 4.5★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.