HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (5,800 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (5,800)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Refresh	165Hz	240Hz
Panel	IPS	QD-OLED
Colour	99% sRGB	99% DCI-P3

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.8/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor

Under £250 — competitive 1440p 165Hz IPS pricing from HP's gaming line
99% sRGB colour accuracy adequate for colour-sensitive work alongside gaming
AMD FreeSync Premium supports variable refresh without G-Sync pricing premium
HP's brand reliability and support network trusted for business and gaming users
5,800 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ from mixed gaming and WFH users

99% sRGB vs 98% DCI-P3 on premium alternatives — less wide gamut for HDR content
165Hz is the standard competitive tier, not the fastest in this comparison
HP OMEN brand less prestigious than ASUS ROG or LG UltraGear among gaming enthusiasts

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor: 99% sRGB vs 98% DCI-P3 on premium alternatives — less wide gamut for HDR content; 165Hz is the standard competitive tier, not the fastest in this comparison. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 5,800 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.