Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor	Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,400)	4.5★ (6,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Size	32" 4K	49" 32:9 5120x1440
Refresh	144Hz	240Hz

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide: 49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

49-inch 32:9 super ultrawide equals two 27-inch QHD monitors side by side with no bezel gap
1000R aggressive curve wraps the display around your field of view for total immersion
240Hz at 5120x1440 delivers smooth high-refresh gaming across the vast canvas
QLED quantum dot colour with 1000 nits peak brightness for vivid HDR
Replaces a dual-monitor setup for productivity with seamless single-screen workflow

£1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz
Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk
Not all games support 32:9 aspect ratio natively

FAQ

Which is better, Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz or Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch?

Is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz worth the extra cost?

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Who is the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch best suited to?

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment. Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide: £1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz; Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide at 4.5★ from 6,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.