Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor vs Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (4,200 owners)

27" 1080p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, LowBlue, Ambiglow, USB-C. Budget IPS gaming with Ambiglow.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor	Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.8/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,400)	4.5★ (4,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Size	32" 4K	27" FHD
Refresh	144Hz	165Hz
USB-C	18W charging	Yes
Price	Best value 32" 4K	Under £150

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10. 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. That said, the Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS is worth considering if 27" 1080p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, LowBlue, Ambiglow, USB-C. Budget IPS gaming with Ambiglow. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS

Ambiglow projects matching colours onto the wall behind — immersive bias lighting at budget pricing
165Hz IPS at 27-inch for under £150 — value gaming monitor tier
1ms MPRT motion clarity for competitive gaming
USB-C connectivity for single-cable setup
LowBlue mode for extended session eye comfort

1080p at 27-inch — 1440p more appropriate for this size in 2026
Ambiglow adds colour projection but also adds RGB power draw
IPS glow visible in dark scenes from off-axis viewing positions

FAQ

Which is better, Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz or Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch?

Is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz worth the extra cost?

Yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Who is the Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1080p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, LowBlue, Ambiglow, USB-C. Budget IPS gaming with Ambiglow.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment. Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS: 1080p at 27-inch — 1440p more appropriate for this size in 2026; Ambiglow adds colour projection but also adds RGB power draw.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and Philips Evnia 27M1N3200ZA 27-inch 165Hz IPS at 4.5★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.