Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor vs MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (2,800 owners)

27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor	MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,400)	4.5★ (2,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Refresh	144Hz	144Hz
HDMI	2.1 (PS5/Xbox)	2.1 (PS5 compatible)

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

4K resolution at 27-inch — the sharpest pixel density of any reviewed gaming monitor
144Hz at 4K is achievable on RTX 4080/4090 or RX 7900 XTX level GPUs
HDMI 2.1 enables 4K/144Hz from PlayStation 5 — the only console that benefits from 4K 144Hz
1ms GtG response time competitive with 1440p alternatives
MSI's gaming monitor value positioning vs Dell, ASUS ROG and Samsung premium branding

4K at 144Hz requires GPU investment of £600+ — the monitor demands matching hardware
144Hz at 4K is the minimum premium tier — OLED alternatives offer better contrast

FAQ

Which is better, Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz or MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz?

Is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz worth the extra cost?

Yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Who is the MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

27" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Affordable 4K 144Hz gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment. MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: 4K at 144Hz requires GPU investment of £600+ — the monitor demands matching hardware; 144Hz at 4K is the minimum premium tier — OLED alternatives offer better contrast.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG274URH 27-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor at 4.5★ from 2,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.