Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (5,600 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor	LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,400)	4.5★ (5,600)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Refresh	144Hz	165Hz
HDMI	2.1 (PS5/Xbox)	2.0
Price	Best value 32" 4K	Under £200

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.9/10. 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. That said, the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz is worth considering if 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

Under £200 — most affordable 27-inch 1440p 165Hz IPS gaming monitor reviewed
1ms GtG response competitive with premium alternatives at fraction of the cost
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections for versatile room placement
FreeSync Premium for tear-free gaming on AMD GPUs
LG's display engineering at the most accessible gaming monitor price point

HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh
HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance
Fewer features than LG 27GP850B-B at the same brand but lower price tier

FAQ

Which is better, Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz or LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch?

Is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz worth the extra cost?

Yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Who is the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment. LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz: HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh; HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz at 4.5★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.