Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor vs HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (5,800 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor	HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.8/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,400)	4.5★ (5,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Refresh	144Hz	165Hz
Price	Best value 32" 4K	Under £250

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10. 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. That said, the HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor

Under £250 — competitive 1440p 165Hz IPS pricing from HP's gaming line
99% sRGB colour accuracy adequate for colour-sensitive work alongside gaming
AMD FreeSync Premium supports variable refresh without G-Sync pricing premium
HP's brand reliability and support network trusted for business and gaming users
5,800 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ from mixed gaming and WFH users

99% sRGB vs 98% DCI-P3 on premium alternatives — less wide gamut for HDR content
165Hz is the standard competitive tier, not the fastest in this comparison
HP OMEN brand less prestigious than ASUS ROG or LG UltraGear among gaming enthusiasts

FAQ

Which is better, Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz or HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz?

Is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz worth the extra cost?

Yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Who is the HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms MPRT, AMD FreeSync, 99% sRGB. HP's gaming display entry.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment. HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor: 99% sRGB vs 98% DCI-P3 on premium alternatives — less wide gamut for HDR content; 165Hz is the standard competitive tier, not the fastest in this comparison.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and HP OMEN 27q QHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor at 4.5★ from 5,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.