Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED vs INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 21:9 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, 99.3% DCI-P3, 1800R. Ultrawide QD-OLED gaming.

Full Review

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.3★ (1,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Panel	QD-OLED	4K OLED
Size	34" 21:9	27-inch
Refresh	165Hz	160Hz
Response	0.1ms	0.03ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10. 34" 21:9 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, 99.3% DCI-P3, 1800R. Ultrawide QD-OLED gaming. That said, the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED

QD-OLED panel delivers OLED blacks and Quantum Dot colour accuracy in ultrawide format
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide at QD-OLED quality — the best ultrawide gaming display available
0.1ms response time combines ultrawide immersion with OLED responsiveness
1800R curvature wraps the ultrawide display naturally around field of view
99.3% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming immersion

£750+ — QD-OLED ultrawide premium pricing
21:9 aspect ratio has game compatibility limitations for older titles
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static HUD elements over extended gaming periods

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

FAQ

Which is better, Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED?

Is the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 21:9 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, 99.3% DCI-P3, 1800R. Ultrawide QD-OLED gaming.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED: £750+ — QD-OLED ultrawide premium pricing; 21:9 aspect ratio has game compatibility limitations for older titles. INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dell Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor at 4.3★ from 1,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.