Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor vs iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (2,400 owners)

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

Full Review

iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (3,600 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, FreeSync, USB hub, 100W USB-C. Underrated 1440p value monitor.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor	iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (2,400)	4.5★ (3,600)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Resolution	3440×1440	1440p
Refresh	165Hz	165Hz
USB-C	65W charging	100W (highest budget)

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor: 34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide. iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD: 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, FreeSync, USB hub, 100W USB-C. Underrated 1440p value monitor. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

34-inch 21:9 delivers ultrawide immersion at lower cost than OLED ultrawide alternatives
USB-C 65W charges a laptop from the monitor with single-cable setup
HDR600 is mid-tier real HDR — better than HDR400 but below Mini-LED alternatives
Corsair iCUE RGB syncs with keyboards, mouse and PC case for coordinated lighting
165Hz at WQHD 3440×1440 for competitive play on the ultrawide format

IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming
Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues
34-inch requires minimum 80cm desk depth for comfortable viewing

iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD

100W USB-C charges and connects a laptop with one cable — the highest USB-C wattage in budget gaming monitors
USB hub with 2x USB-A passes through from USB-C connection — desk tidy organisation
1440p 165Hz IPS at under £250 — competitive with LG UltraGear at lower pricing
iiyama's 30-year professional monitor heritage — OEM supplier to major display brands
FreeSync Premium for tear-free AMD GPU gaming

iiyama brand less recognised than LG or Samsung in consumer gaming market
Lower peak brightness than premium alternatives for HDR content
Limited HDR400 tier — not genuine HDR performance

FAQ

Which is better, Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 or iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch?

Is the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 worth the extra cost?

Yes — Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor scores higher at 9.0/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 best suited to?

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

Who is the iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, FreeSync, USB hub, 100W USB-C. Underrated 1440p value monitor.

What are the main downsides of each?

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor: IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming; Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues. iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD: iiyama brand less recognised than LG or Samsung in consumer gaming market; Lower peak brightness than premium alternatives for HDR content.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor sits at 4.4★ from 2,400 verified Amazon owners, and iiyama G-Master GB2770QSU 27-inch 165Hz QHD at 4.5★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.