ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

8.6/10 Great

4.5★ (12,400 owners)

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (12,400)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Size	24" FHD	32-inch 4K
Panel	TN	QD-OLED
Refresh	165Hz	240Hz
Response	0.5ms	0.03ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.6/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

0.5ms GtG response is the fastest reviewed — TN panel's key advantage over IPS
ELMB Sync combines G-Sync adaptive refresh with backlight strobing simultaneously — unique Asus feature
165Hz at under £150 — the most affordable gaming monitor in this comparison
12,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ — extensive community validation
Suitable as a second competitive gaming monitor or first-time gaming monitor upgrade

TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives
1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work
Colours look washed out vs IPS — acceptable for competitive gaming, poor for everything else

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz best suited to?

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor: TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives; 1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 12,400 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.