ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

8.6/10 Great

4.5★ (12,400 owners)

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Full Review

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	9.1/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (12,400)	4.5★ (6,400)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Size	24" FHD	32" 4K
Refresh	165Hz	144Hz
Price	Under £150	Best value 32" 4K

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.6/10. 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. That said, the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

0.5ms GtG response is the fastest reviewed — TN panel's key advantage over IPS
ELMB Sync combines G-Sync adaptive refresh with backlight strobing simultaneously — unique Asus feature
165Hz at under £150 — the most affordable gaming monitor in this comparison
12,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ — extensive community validation
Suitable as a second competitive gaming monitor or first-time gaming monitor upgrade

TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives
1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work
Colours look washed out vs IPS — acceptable for competitive gaming, poor for everything else

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz or Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz?

Is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz worth the extra cost?

The Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz best suited to?

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor: TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives; 1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work. Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 12,400 verified Amazon owners, and Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor at 4.5★ from 6,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.