ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

8.6/10 Great

4.5★ (12,400 owners)

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Full Review

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (2,400 owners)

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor	Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (12,400)	4.4★ (2,400)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Size	24" FHD	34-inch 21:9
Refresh	165Hz	165Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10. 34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide. That said, the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor

0.5ms GtG response is the fastest reviewed — TN panel's key advantage over IPS
ELMB Sync combines G-Sync adaptive refresh with backlight strobing simultaneously — unique Asus feature
165Hz at under £150 — the most affordable gaming monitor in this comparison
12,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ — extensive community validation
Suitable as a second competitive gaming monitor or first-time gaming monitor upgrade

TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives
1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work
Colours look washed out vs IPS — acceptable for competitive gaming, poor for everything else

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

34-inch 21:9 delivers ultrawide immersion at lower cost than OLED ultrawide alternatives
USB-C 65W charges a laptop from the monitor with single-cable setup
HDR600 is mid-tier real HDR — better than HDR400 but below Mini-LED alternatives
Corsair iCUE RGB syncs with keyboards, mouse and PC case for coordinated lighting
165Hz at WQHD 3440×1440 for competitive play on the ultrawide format

IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming
Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues
34-inch requires minimum 80cm desk depth for comfortable viewing

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz or Corsair XENEON 34QHD165?

Is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz worth the extra cost?

The Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz best suited to?

24" 1080p 165Hz TN, 0.5ms, G-Sync Compatible, ELMB Sync. Budget TN esports classic.

Who is the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 best suited to?

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor: TN panel colour accuracy and viewing angles significantly worse than IPS alternatives; 1080p and TN panel less suitable for content creation, photo editing or creative work. Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor: IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming; Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS VG248QG 24-inch 165Hz Gaming Monitor sits at 4.5★ from 12,400 verified Amazon owners, and Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor at 4.4★ from 2,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.