ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor vs Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.4★ (8,400 owners)

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Full Review

Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (2,800 owners)

27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor	Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (8,400)	4.4★ (2,800)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Resolution	4K 28-inch	1440p
Refresh	60Hz	240Hz
Panel	IPS	Mini-LED

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.8/10. 27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming. That said, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor is worth considering if 28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

4K at 28-inch creates stunning pixel density — text, UI and games look sharper than any 1440p monitor
Under £250 — the most affordable 4K gaming monitor reviewed
HDR10 support enhances HDR content on compatible games and streaming
Shadow Boost brightens dark game areas for better visibility
8,400 Amazon reviews at 4.4★ — extensively validated budget 4K option

60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives
60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles
IPS response time not as refined as higher-tier alternatives

Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED

Mini-LED backlight delivers 1400 nits peak brightness — genuine HDR performance unlike LCD alternatives
576 local dimming zones create near-OLED contrast without OLED burn-in risk
Ambiglow projects matching colours onto the wall behind the monitor for immersive gaming environments
97% DCI-P3 colour accuracy covers professional creative work alongside gaming
240Hz makes it one of the fastest Mini-LED gaming monitors available

Mini-LED backlight blooming visible on very dark scenes with bright elements
1400 nit brightness is eye-fatiguing in dark room gaming at full HDR settings
Price premium over IPS alternatives for the Mini-LED backlight technology

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch or Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz?

Is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch worth the extra cost?

The Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch best suited to?

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Who is the Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz best suited to?

27" 1440p 240Hz Mini-LED, 1400 nits, Ambiglow, 97% DCI-P3. Mini-LED HDR gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor: 60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives; 60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles. Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED: Mini-LED backlight blooming visible on very dark scenes with bright elements; 1400 nit brightness is eye-fatiguing in dark room gaming at full HDR settings.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor sits at 4.4★ from 8,400 verified Amazon owners, and Philips Evnia 27M2C5500W 240Hz Mini-LED at 4.4★ from 2,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.