ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.4★ (8,400 owners)

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (8,400)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Refresh	60Hz	240Hz
Panel	IPS	QD-OLED

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.8/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor is worth considering if 28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

4K at 28-inch creates stunning pixel density — text, UI and games look sharper than any 1440p monitor
Under £250 — the most affordable 4K gaming monitor reviewed
HDR10 support enhances HDR content on compatible games and streaming
Shadow Boost brightens dark game areas for better visibility
8,400 Amazon reviews at 4.4★ — extensively validated budget 4K option

60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives
60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles
IPS response time not as refined as higher-tier alternatives

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch best suited to?

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor: 60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives; 60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor sits at 4.4★ from 8,400 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.