ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor vs Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.4★ (8,400 owners)

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Full Review

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,400 owners)

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor	Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	9.1/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (8,400)	4.5★ (6,400)
Verdict	Great	Excellent
Refresh	60Hz	144Hz
Price	Under £250	Best value 32" 4K

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10. 32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming. That said, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor is worth considering if 28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

4K at 28-inch creates stunning pixel density — text, UI and games look sharper than any 1440p monitor
Under £250 — the most affordable 4K gaming monitor reviewed
HDR10 support enhances HDR content on compatible games and streaming
Shadow Boost brightens dark game areas for better visibility
8,400 Amazon reviews at 4.4★ — extensively validated budget 4K option

60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives
60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles
IPS response time not as refined as higher-tier alternatives

Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor

Best-value 32-inch 4K 144Hz monitor — significantly cheaper than Dell, ASUS and Samsung equivalents
KVM switch enables controlling two computers with one keyboard and mouse — office and gaming PC on one screen
USB-C 18W charges laptop alongside video signal in one cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz
Display Widget app on phone controls monitor settings without physical buttons

IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives
Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment
6,400 reviews is fewer than comparable alternatives — less community validation

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch or Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz?

Is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch worth the extra cost?

The Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch best suited to?

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Who is the Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz best suited to?

32" 4K 144Hz IPS, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 18W, KVM switch, Display Widget. Best-value 32" 4K gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor: 60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives; 60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles. Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor: IPS backlight bleed visible in dark scenes — less controlled than VA alternatives; Gigabyte brand less prestigious than Dell, ASUS or Samsung in monitor segment.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor sits at 4.4★ from 8,400 verified Amazon owners, and Gigabyte M32U 32-inch 4K 144Hz Monitor at 4.5★ from 6,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.