ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

9.3/10 Excellent

4.6★ (3,800 owners)

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	9.3/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (3,800)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Panel	OLED	QD-OLED
Refresh	240Hz	240Hz
Response	0.03ms	0.03ms
Coating	Micro-texture (anti-reflective)	Anti-glare

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor: 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

OLED panel delivers true blacks and infinite contrast at 240Hz
Micro-texture coating reduces reflections without degrading the OLED image quality
ROG Aura Sync ties monitor RGB to PC case, keyboard and mouse lighting
0.03ms response time eliminates all motion blur at any frame rate
ASUS ROG brand's extensive gaming peripheral ecosystem

£650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF
240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players
Micro-texture coating slightly reduces peak brightness vs glossy OLED alternatives

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED best suited to?

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor: £650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF; 240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor sits at 4.6★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.