ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor vs INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

9.3/10 Excellent

4.6★ (3,800 owners)

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Full Review

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.3/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (3,800)	4.3★ (1,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Panel	OLED	4K OLED
Refresh	240Hz	160Hz
Response	0.03ms	0.03ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor edges ahead with a 9.3/10 vs 8.9/10. 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED. That said, the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

OLED panel delivers true blacks and infinite contrast at 240Hz
Micro-texture coating reduces reflections without degrading the OLED image quality
ROG Aura Sync ties monitor RGB to PC case, keyboard and mouse lighting
0.03ms response time eliminates all motion blur at any frame rate
ASUS ROG brand's extensive gaming peripheral ecosystem

£650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF
240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players
Micro-texture coating slightly reduces peak brightness vs glossy OLED alternatives

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED or INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED?

Is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED worth the extra cost?

Yes — ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor scores higher at 9.3/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED best suited to?

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor: £650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF; 240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players. INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor sits at 4.6★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor at 4.3★ from 1,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.