ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor vs Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

9.3/10 Excellent

4.6★ (3,800 owners)

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Full Review

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (2,400 owners)

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor	Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.3/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (3,800)	4.4★ (2,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Resolution	1440p	3440×1440
Refresh	240Hz	165Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor edges ahead with a 9.3/10 vs 9.0/10. 27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED. That said, the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor is worth considering if 34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor

OLED panel delivers true blacks and infinite contrast at 240Hz
Micro-texture coating reduces reflections without degrading the OLED image quality
ROG Aura Sync ties monitor RGB to PC case, keyboard and mouse lighting
0.03ms response time eliminates all motion blur at any frame rate
ASUS ROG brand's extensive gaming peripheral ecosystem

£650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF
240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players
Micro-texture coating slightly reduces peak brightness vs glossy OLED alternatives

Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor

34-inch 21:9 delivers ultrawide immersion at lower cost than OLED ultrawide alternatives
USB-C 65W charges a laptop from the monitor with single-cable setup
HDR600 is mid-tier real HDR — better than HDR400 but below Mini-LED alternatives
Corsair iCUE RGB syncs with keyboards, mouse and PC case for coordinated lighting
165Hz at WQHD 3440×1440 for competitive play on the ultrawide format

IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming
Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues
34-inch requires minimum 80cm desk depth for comfortable viewing

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED or Corsair XENEON 34QHD165?

Is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED worth the extra cost?

Yes — ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor scores higher at 9.3/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED best suited to?

27" 1440p 240Hz OLED, 0.03ms, micro-texture coating, ROG Aura sync. ASUS's flagship OLED.

Who is the Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 best suited to?

34" 21:9 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, USB-C 65W, HDR600, Corsair iCUE. Corsair ecosystem ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor: £650+ — premium OLED pricing in line with Alienware AW2725DF; 240Hz trails the AW2725DF's 360Hz for the most competitive players. Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor: IPS panel at 21:9 — less contrast than VA or OLED for atmospheric gaming; Corsair iCUE software has occasional stability issues.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM OLED Monitor sits at 4.6★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Corsair XENEON 34QHD165 Ultrawide Monitor at 4.4★ from 2,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.