ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz vs LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz

9.5/10 Outstanding

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle.

Full Review

LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor

9.2/10 Excellent

4.6★ (11,800 owners)

27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz	LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.5/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (2,200)	4.6★ (11,800)
Verdict	Outstanding	Excellent
Panel	4K OLED	IPS Nano
Size	32-inch	27"
Response	0.03ms	1ms GtG

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.5/10 vs 9.2/10. 32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle. That said, the LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz

4K OLED at 240Hz — the highest resolution and refresh rate combination in an OLED gaming monitor
0.03ms response time combines 4K detail with OLED speed simultaneousy
Thunderbolt 4 connects MacBook Pro or creative workstation with single cable
HDMI 2.1 supports PS5 4K/120fps and Xbox Series X at maximum specification
99% DCI-P3 professional colour accuracy — the only 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed with Thunderbolt 4

£1,500+ is the highest price reviewed — the premium display for those who've stopped compromising
4K at 240Hz requires RTX 4090 or equivalent to exploit fully — GPU investment required
32-inch 4K OLED burn-in risk with static elements — screen saver discipline needed

LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor

4K 160Hz — the sweet spot for combined high-resolution and high-refresh gaming
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at native 4K/120fps
1ms GtG response time — eliminates visible ghosting in fast games
DCI-P3 98% colour coverage — excellent for single-player and creative work
G-Sync Compatible and FreeSync Premium Pro

4K at 160Hz requires an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX — verify your GPU before buying
IPS glow visible on dark scenes — inherent to IPS technology
Premium price — OLED alternatives are emerging at similar cost

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM or LG 27GP950-B UltraGear?

Is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM worth the extra cost?

Yes — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz scores higher at 9.5/10 vs 9.2/10.

Who is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM best suited to?

32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle.

Who is the LG 27GP950-B UltraGear best suited to?

27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz: £1,500+ is the highest price reviewed — the premium display for those who've stopped compromising; 4K at 240Hz requires RTX 4090 or equivalent to exploit fully — GPU investment required. LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor: 4K at 160Hz requires an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX — verify your GPU before buying; IPS glow visible on dark scenes — inherent to IPS technology.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz sits at 4.6★ from 2,200 verified Amazon owners, and LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor at 4.6★ from 11,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.