ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz vs LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor (2026)
Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz
32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle.
Check Price ↗ Full Review
LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor
27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps.
Check Price ↗ Full ReviewAt a Glance
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz | LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| 247Verdict Score | 9.5/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Owner Rating | 4.6★ (2,200) | 4.6★ (11,800) |
| Verdict | Outstanding | Excellent |
| Panel | 4K OLED | IPS Nano |
| Size | 32-inch | 27" |
| Response | 0.03ms | 1ms GtG |
Quick Verdict
Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.5/10 vs 9.2/10. 32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle. That said, the LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps..
Pros & Cons Side by Side
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz
- 4K OLED at 240Hz — the highest resolution and refresh rate combination in an OLED gaming monitor
- 0.03ms response time combines 4K detail with OLED speed simultaneousy
- Thunderbolt 4 connects MacBook Pro or creative workstation with single cable
- HDMI 2.1 supports PS5 4K/120fps and Xbox Series X at maximum specification
- 99% DCI-P3 professional colour accuracy — the only 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed with Thunderbolt 4
- £1,500+ is the highest price reviewed — the premium display for those who've stopped compromising
- 4K at 240Hz requires RTX 4090 or equivalent to exploit fully — GPU investment required
- 32-inch 4K OLED burn-in risk with static elements — screen saver discipline needed
LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor
- 4K 160Hz — the sweet spot for combined high-resolution and high-refresh gaming
- HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox Series X at native 4K/120fps
- 1ms GtG response time — eliminates visible ghosting in fast games
- DCI-P3 98% colour coverage — excellent for single-player and creative work
- G-Sync Compatible and FreeSync Premium Pro
- 4K at 160Hz requires an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX — verify your GPU before buying
- IPS glow visible on dark scenes — inherent to IPS technology
- Premium price — OLED alternatives are emerging at similar cost
FAQ
Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM or LG 27GP950-B UltraGear?
Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.5/10 vs 9.2/10. 32" 4K OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, 99% DCI-P3. The 4K OLED gaming pinnacle. That said, the LG 27GP950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K IPS at 160Hz. 1ms GtG. HDMI 2.1 for PS5 and Xbox Series X 4K/120fps..
Is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM worth the extra cost?
Yes — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM 4K 240Hz scores higher at 9.5/10 vs 9.2/10.
Also Worth Considering
Dell Alienware AW2725DF QD-OLED Monitor
27" 1440p 360Hz QD-OLED, 0.03ms, Infinity Core lighting. The ultimate competitive OLED.
Check Price ↗ Full Review
LG C3 OLED 42-inch Gaming TV/Monitor
OLED evo, 120Hz, VRR, 4K, 0.1ms, Dolby Vision Gaming, G-Sync Compatible. The screen upgrade.
Check Price ↗ Full Review
Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide
34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.
Check Price ↗ Full Review