ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch vs INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,800 owners)

27" 1440p OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, custom heatsink, anti-glare, 99% DCI-P3. The 27-inch OLED.

Full Review

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

8.9/10 Great

4.3★ (1,800 owners)

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch	INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (2,800)	4.3★ (1,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Size	27" 1440p	27-inch
Panel	OLED	4K OLED
Refresh	240Hz	160Hz
Response	0.03ms	0.03ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10. 27" 1440p OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, custom heatsink, anti-glare, 99% DCI-P3. The 27-inch OLED. That said, the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor is worth considering if 27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch

27-inch 1440p OLED 240Hz combines the sweet-spot size and resolution with OLED infinite contrast
Custom heatsink and graphene film reduce OLED burn-in risk significantly
0.03ms response — the fastest panel technology for competitive gaming
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections while preserving OLED depth
99% DCI-P3 serves creative work alongside the best gaming experience

£900+ OLED pricing
OLED burn-in caution still required with static elements
240Hz at 1440p OLED needs a capable GPU

INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor

4K OLED at 27-inch for under £500 — the most affordable 4K OLED gaming monitor reviewed
OLED infinite contrast at 27-inch 4K provides dramatic image quality at mid-range pricing
USB-C 90W charges a laptop while providing video — single cable desk setup
KVM enables two computers on one monitor for hybrid work-gaming setups
160Hz is excellent for most gaming — only competitive esports players need 240Hz+

INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS
160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels
OLED burn-in risk requires screen saver discipline

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM or INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED?

Is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM worth the extra cost?

Yes — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM best suited to?

27" 1440p OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, custom heatsink, anti-glare, 99% DCI-P3. The 27-inch OLED.

Who is the INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED best suited to?

27" 4K OLED 160Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, USB-C 90W, KVM. Budget 4K OLED gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch: £900+ OLED pricing; OLED burn-in caution still required with static elements. INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor: INNOCN brand newer — less established warranty and service vs Dell or ASUS; 160Hz trails 240Hz alternatives — competitive esports players may prefer faster panels.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM 27-inch sits at 4.6★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and INNOCN 27M1F Pro 4K 160Hz OLED Monitor at 4.3★ from 1,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.