ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor vs MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.6★ (3,200 owners)

4K 60Hz IPS, 99% DCI-P3, AQCOLOR, factory calibrated, Thunderbolt 4. Creator + gaming monitor.

Full Review

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,200 owners)

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

Full Review

At a Glance

	ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor	MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	9.4/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (3,200)	4.6★ (2,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Colour	99% DCI-P3	99% DCI-P3

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10. 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship. That said, the ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor is worth considering if 4K 60Hz IPS, 99% DCI-P3, AQCOLOR, factory calibrated, Thunderbolt 4. Creator + gaming monitor. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor

99% DCI-P3 and 100% sRGB factory calibrated — professional colour accuracy verified per unit
Thunderbolt 4 connects MacBook Pro or Dell XPS with single cable for video + charging + data
AQCOLOR technology self-calibrates over time to maintain colour accuracy
Suitable for both professional creative work and gaming — the dual-purpose monitor
ASUS ProArt brand trusted by professional photographers, video editors and 3D artists

60Hz only — not suitable as a primary gaming monitor for fast-paced titles
4K 60Hz limits competitive gaming refresh rate significantly
Creator-monitor pricing reflects professional colour accuracy over gaming feature set

MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz

32-inch 4K QD-OLED 240Hz — combines resolution, size and panel technology at a lower price than ASUS ROG equivalent
QD-OLED infinite contrast with 4K pixel density is the most immersive gaming experience available at 32-inch
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections without compromising QD-OLED colour depth
0.03ms response matches the fastest OLED alternatives
99% DCI-P3 serves professional creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier
QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods
4K 240Hz requires RTX 4090 to push maximum refresh in demanding titles

FAQ

Which is better, ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV or MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED?

Is the ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV worth the extra cost?

The MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV best suited to?

4K 60Hz IPS, 99% DCI-P3, AQCOLOR, factory calibrated, Thunderbolt 4. Creator + gaming monitor.

Who is the MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED best suited to?

32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz, 0.03ms, 99% DCI-P3, anti-glare. MSI 4K OLED flagship.

What are the main downsides of each?

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor: 60Hz only — not suitable as a primary gaming monitor for fast-paced titles; 4K 60Hz limits competitive gaming refresh rate significantly. MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz: £1,000+ — 4K OLED pricing tier; QD-OLED burn-in risk with static elements over extended periods.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV 4K Monitor sits at 4.6★ from 3,200 verified Amazon owners, and MSI MAG 321URX 32-inch 4K OLED 240Hz at 4.6★ from 2,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.