Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Full Review

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide	Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.5★ (6,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Panel	QD-OLED	QLED
Size	34" 21:9 3440x1440	49" 32:9 5120x1440
Refresh	165Hz	240Hz
Reviews	4,200 at 4.6★	6,800 at 4.5★

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.2/10. 34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark. That said, the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide is worth considering if 49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast with perfect blacks for the most immersive gaming
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide wraps the field of view for racing, flight and immersive games
0.1ms response — the fastest of any panel technology
165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro for tear-free high-refresh gaming
99.3% DCI-P3 colour accuracy serves creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier
OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use
Ultrawide requires GPU power to drive 3440x1440 at high frame rates

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide

49-inch 32:9 super ultrawide equals two 27-inch QHD monitors side by side with no bezel gap
1000R aggressive curve wraps the display around your field of view for total immersion
240Hz at 5120x1440 delivers smooth high-refresh gaming across the vast canvas
QLED quantum dot colour with 1000 nits peak brightness for vivid HDR
Replaces a dual-monitor setup for productivity with seamless single-screen workflow

£1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz
Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk
Not all games support 32:9 aspect ratio natively

FAQ

Which is better, Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch?

Is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 9.2/10.

Who is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Who is the Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch best suited to?

49" 5120x1440 240Hz, 1000R curve, QLED, G-Sync, dual-QHD. The super ultrawide.

What are the main downsides of each?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide: £1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier; OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use. Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide: £1,000+ and requires a powerful GPU to drive 5120x1440 at 240Hz; Enormous footprint requires a deep, wide desk.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Super Ultrawide at 4.5★ from 6,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.