Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide vs Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Full Review

Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (3,600 owners)

27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide	Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.4★ (3,600)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Panel	QD-OLED	4K Mini-LED
Refresh	165Hz	144Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10. 34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark. That said, the Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED is worth considering if 27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast with perfect blacks for the most immersive gaming
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide wraps the field of view for racing, flight and immersive games
0.1ms response — the fastest of any panel technology
165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro for tear-free high-refresh gaming
99.3% DCI-P3 colour accuracy serves creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier
OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use
Ultrawide requires GPU power to drive 3440x1440 at high frame rates

Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED

4K 144Hz Mini-LED delivers HDR brightness that standard 4K IPS cannot approach
USB-C 90W charges MacBook Pro or Dell XPS with single cable
HDMI 2.1 enables PS5 and Xbox 4K/120Hz at the same time as PC connection
Ambiglow projects screen colours onto the wall for peripheral immersion
Under £500 for 4K Mini-LED 144Hz — better value than ASUS ProArt or Samsung Neo at this spec

Mini-LED blooming visible in dark scenes with bright elements — OLED avoids this entirely
27-inch 4K pixel density is excellent but the panel is smaller than 32-inch alternatives
Ambiglow RGB behind monitor divides opinion aesthetically

FAQ

Which is better, Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K?

Is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Who is the Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K best suited to?

27" 4K 144Hz Mini-LED, USB-C 90W, Ambiglow, HDMI 2.1, 1000 nits. 4K Mini-LED all-rounder.

What are the main downsides of each?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide: £1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier; OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use. Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED: Mini-LED blooming visible in dark scenes with bright elements — OLED avoids this entirely; 27-inch 4K pixel density is excellent but the panel is smaller than 32-inch alternatives.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Philips Momentum 279M1RV 4K 144Hz Mini-LED at 4.4★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.