Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide vs LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Full Review

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (3,600 owners)

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide	LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.5★ (3,600)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Panel	QD-OLED	Nano IPS
Size	34" 21:9 3440x1440	32" 1440p
Refresh	165Hz	240Hz
Response	0.1ms	1ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10. 34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark. That said, the LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor is worth considering if 32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast with perfect blacks for the most immersive gaming
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide wraps the field of view for racing, flight and immersive games
0.1ms response — the fastest of any panel technology
165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro for tear-free high-refresh gaming
99.3% DCI-P3 colour accuracy serves creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier
OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use
Ultrawide requires GPU power to drive 3440x1440 at high frame rates

LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor

32-inch 1440p provides more immersive single-player experience than 27-inch alternatives
Nano IPS technology achieves 98% DCI-P3 at 240Hz — colour and speed simultaneously
240Hz on a 32-inch panel — maximising both size and refresh rate
G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro for both GPU brands
LG's monitor engineering heritage across professional and gaming displays

32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances
Larger footprint requires more desk space
VESA mount arm required if using desk space efficiently at 32-inch

FAQ

Which is better, Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch?

Is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Who is the LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch best suited to?

32" 1440p 240Hz IPS Nano, 1ms, G-Sync Compatible. Immersive 32-inch high-refresh gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide: £1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier; OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use. LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor: 32-inch 1440p pixel density slightly lower than 27-inch — text less crisp at standard viewing distances; Larger footprint requires more desk space.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and LG UltraGear 32GQ850B-B 32-inch QHD Monitor at 4.5★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.