Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide vs LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Full Review

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (5,600 owners)

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide	LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.5★ (5,600)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Panel	QD-OLED	IPS
Refresh	165Hz	165Hz
Response	0.1ms	1ms

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10. 34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark. That said, the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz is worth considering if 27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast with perfect blacks for the most immersive gaming
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide wraps the field of view for racing, flight and immersive games
0.1ms response — the fastest of any panel technology
165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro for tear-free high-refresh gaming
99.3% DCI-P3 colour accuracy serves creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier
OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use
Ultrawide requires GPU power to drive 3440x1440 at high frame rates

LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz

Under £200 — most affordable 27-inch 1440p 165Hz IPS gaming monitor reviewed
1ms GtG response competitive with premium alternatives at fraction of the cost
Anti-glare coating reduces reflections for versatile room placement
FreeSync Premium for tear-free gaming on AMD GPUs
LG's display engineering at the most accessible gaming monitor price point

HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh
HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance
Fewer features than LG 27GP850B-B at the same brand but lower price tier

FAQ

Which is better, Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch?

Is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Who is the LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch best suited to?

27" 1440p 165Hz IPS, 1ms, HDMI 2.0, FreeSync, anti-glare. Best-value 1440p 165Hz gaming.

What are the main downsides of each?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide: £1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier; OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use. LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz: HDMI 2.0 (not 2.1) — limits 1440p 165Hz to DisplayPort connection for full refresh; HDR400 is minimum tier — not genuine HDR performance.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and LG UltraGear 27GQ75B-B 27-inch 1440p 165Hz at 4.5★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.