Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

9.4/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Full Review

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

8.8/10 Great

4.4★ (8,400 owners)

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide	ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	8.8/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (4,200)	4.4★ (8,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Panel	QD-OLED	IPS
Refresh	165Hz	60Hz

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 8.8/10. 34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark. That said, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor is worth considering if 28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide

QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast with perfect blacks for the most immersive gaming
34-inch 21:9 ultrawide wraps the field of view for racing, flight and immersive games
0.1ms response — the fastest of any panel technology
165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro for tear-free high-refresh gaming
99.3% DCI-P3 colour accuracy serves creative work alongside gaming

£1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier
OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use
Ultrawide requires GPU power to drive 3440x1440 at high frame rates

ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor

4K at 28-inch creates stunning pixel density — text, UI and games look sharper than any 1440p monitor
Under £250 — the most affordable 4K gaming monitor reviewed
HDR10 support enhances HDR content on compatible games and streaming
Shadow Boost brightens dark game areas for better visibility
8,400 Amazon reviews at 4.4★ — extensively validated budget 4K option

60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives
60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles
IPS response time not as refined as higher-tier alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch or ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch?

Is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch worth the extra cost?

Yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 8.8/10.

Who is the Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch best suited to?

34" 3440x1440 QD-OLED 165Hz, 0.1ms, FreeSync Premium Pro, infinite contrast. The QD-OLED benchmark.

Who is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch best suited to?

28" 4K 60Hz IPS, Freesync, HDR10, shadow boost, blue light filter. Budget 4K gaming monitor.

What are the main downsides of each?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide: £1,000+ QD-OLED pricing tier; OLED burn-in risk with static UI elements over extended use. ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor: 60Hz maximum — gaming at 4K/60fps feels laggy compared to 144Hz alternatives; 60Hz limits competitive gaming significantly — not suitable for esports titles.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Alienware AW3423DWF 34-inch QD-OLED Ultrawide sits at 4.6★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q 28-inch 4K IPS Monitor at 4.4★ from 8,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.