Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera vs Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera

9.3/10 Excellent

4.7★ (3,200 owners)

24.5MP, vintage Nikon F-body design, IBIS, Subject Detection AF, 4K/30fps. The heritage modern.

Full Review

Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera

9.2/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,400 owners)

26MP APS-C, 40mm f/2.8, 3-axis IBIS, pocket-size, snap focus. The street photographer's camera.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera	Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera
247Verdict Score	9.3/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.7★ (3,200)	4.6★ (2,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Sensor	24.5MP full-frame	26MP APS-C
IBIS	5-stop	3-axis

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera: 24.5MP, vintage Nikon F-body design, IBIS, Subject Detection AF, 4K/30fps. The heritage modern. Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera: 26MP APS-C, 40mm f/2.8, 3-axis IBIS, pocket-size, snap focus. The street photographer's camera. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera

Vintage Nikon F-series body design — the most aesthetically nostalgic mirrorless camera available
24.5MP full-frame sensor with 5-stop IBIS in a retro-styled body — modern performance in classic form
Subject Detection AF tracks people, animals and vehicles reliably for street and documentary work
Film simulation modes with Nikon's colour science produce JPEG files requiring minimal post-processing
Nikon Z-mount provides access to Nikon's S-line lenses: the sharpest lenses Nikon has ever made

4K/30fps only — Sony A7C II and Canon R6 Mark II both offer 4K/60fps
Retro design appeals strongly to some but is purely aesthetic — no functional advantage
Z-mount lens ecosystem smaller than Sony E-mount despite rapid growth

Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera

APS-C sensor in a body that fits in a coat pocket — the highest sensor-to-size ratio available
40mm f/2.8 equivalent focal length — the 'normal' lens that renders scenes closest to human vision
Snap Focus mode pre-focuses at a set distance for instant capture without AF delay
3-axis IBIS enables sharp handheld shots at 1/30s in challenging light
Street photography cult: Henri Cartier-Bresson's philosophy of invisible presence made digital

Fixed 40mm — no zoom, no interchangeable lens
No electronic viewfinder — LCD only, difficult in bright sunlight
Premium pricing for a non-interchangeable-lens camera

FAQ

Which is better, Nikon Zf Full-Frame or Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C?

Is the Nikon Zf Full-Frame worth the extra cost?

Yes — Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera scores higher at 9.3/10 vs 9.2/10.

Who is the Nikon Zf Full-Frame best suited to?

24.5MP, vintage Nikon F-body design, IBIS, Subject Detection AF, 4K/30fps. The heritage modern.

Who is the Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C best suited to?

26MP APS-C, 40mm f/2.8, 3-axis IBIS, pocket-size, snap focus. The street photographer's camera.

What are the main downsides of each?

Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera: 4K/30fps only — Sony A7C II and Canon R6 Mark II both offer 4K/60fps; Retro design appeals strongly to some but is purely aesthetic — no functional advantage. Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera: Fixed 40mm — no zoom, no interchangeable lens; No electronic viewfinder — LCD only, difficult in bright sunlight.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Nikon Zf Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera sits at 4.7★ from 3,200 verified Amazon owners, and Ricoh GR IIIx APS-C Compact Camera at 4.6★ from 2,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.