Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera vs Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera

9.4/10 Excellent

4.7★ (2,400 owners)

24.5MP partial stacked CMOS, 6K RAW, 20fps, 120fps 1080p, 5-stop IBIS. The video-first full-frame.

Full Review

Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera

9.2/10 Excellent

4.6★ (4,200 owners)

26MP APS-C, 5-axis IBIS, 4K/120fps, AI AF. Sony's best APS-C camera.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera	Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera
247Verdict Score	9.4/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.7★ (2,400)	4.6★ (4,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Sensor	24.5MP partial stacked CMOS	26MP APS-C BSI
Video	6K internal RAW	4K/120fps
IBIS	5-stop (8-stop combined)	5-axis
Mount	Nikon Z	Sony E-mount

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera edges ahead with a 9.4/10 vs 9.2/10. 24.5MP partial stacked CMOS, 6K RAW, 20fps, 120fps 1080p, 5-stop IBIS. The video-first full-frame. That said, the Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera is worth considering if 26MP APS-C, 5-axis IBIS, 4K/120fps, AI AF. Sony's best APS-C camera. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera

Partial stacked CMOS sensor reduces rolling shutter in video — critical for panning shots
6K internal RAW recording with no crop — the highest internal resolution of any Z-series camera
20fps continuous shooting with full AF — sports and wildlife standard
120fps slow-motion at 1080p enables 5x slow-motion in full resolution
5-stop IBIS works in coordination with Nikon's VR lenses for up to 8-stop combined stabilisation

£2,800 is Sony A7 IV territory — comparison inevitably follows
Partial stacked (not full stacked) sensor — Z9's full stack is technically superior for speed
Nikon Z-mount lens ecosystem smaller than Sony E-mount despite growing rapidly

Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera

5-axis IBIS in an APS-C body — the key upgrade over ZV-E10 II for handheld video
4K/120fps slow motion in APS-C — unique capability at this price
AI subject recognition with animal and bird detection class-leading in the category
26MP BSI CMOS with ISO 32000 native — excellent low-light APS-C performance
Access to full Sony E-mount ecosystem including full-frame lenses

No front-facing screen — vloggers who upgrade from ZV-E10 II will miss this
Smaller grip than full-frame alternatives — less comfortable for large hands
Battery life ~570 shots — better than ZV-E10 II but still bring a spare

FAQ

Which is better, Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame or Sony A6700 APS-C?

Is the Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame worth the extra cost?

Yes — Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera scores higher at 9.4/10 vs 9.2/10.

Who is the Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame best suited to?

24.5MP partial stacked CMOS, 6K RAW, 20fps, 120fps 1080p, 5-stop IBIS. The video-first full-frame.

Who is the Sony A6700 APS-C best suited to?

26MP APS-C, 5-axis IBIS, 4K/120fps, AI AF. Sony's best APS-C camera.

What are the main downsides of each?

Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera: £2,800 is Sony A7 IV territory — comparison inevitably follows; Partial stacked (not full stacked) sensor — Z9's full stack is technically superior for speed. Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera: No front-facing screen — vloggers who upgrade from ZV-E10 II will miss this; Smaller grip than full-frame alternatives — less comfortable for large hands.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Nikon Z6 III Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera sits at 4.7★ from 2,400 verified Amazon owners, and Sony A6700 APS-C Mirrorless Camera at 4.6★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.