Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera vs OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera

9.5/10 Outstanding

4.8★ (900 owners)

45MP full-frame, 30fps, eye-control AF, 8K RAW video. The do-everything professional hybrid.

Full Review

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (2,800 owners)

20MP Micro 4/3, 5-axis IBIS, 4K video, flip screen, compact. Best travel mirrorless under £700.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera	OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
247Verdict Score	9.5/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.8★ (900)	4.5★ (2,800)
Verdict	Outstanding	Great
Sensor	45MP full-frame	20MP Micro 4/3
Video	8K RAW	4K

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera edges ahead with a 9.5/10 vs 8.9/10. 45MP full-frame, 30fps, eye-control AF, 8K RAW video. The do-everything professional hybrid. That said, the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is worth considering if 20MP Micro 4/3, 5-axis IBIS, 4K video, flip screen, compact. Best travel mirrorless under £700. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera

45MP at up to 30fps suits both high-detail stills and fast action
Eye-control AF lets you place the focus point just by looking
8K RAW video makes it a genuine professional hybrid
Excellent subject-detection autofocus for wildlife and sports
Robust weather-sealed professional body

Premium professional pricing
8K video can stress cards and generate heat in long takes
More camera than enthusiasts or casual shooters need

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

5-axis in-body stabilisation at this price is exceptional — Olympus IBIS engineering heritage
Most compact interchangeable lens camera with IBIS available
Micro 4/3 system: smaller lenses enable genuinely pocketable total kit weight
4K video with 5-axis stabilisation for smooth handheld footage
Extensive Micro 4/3 lens ecosystem from OM System, Panasonic and Sigma

Micro 4/3 sensor smaller than APS-C — lower light performance than Sony or Fujifilm at equivalent ISO
Smaller sensor limits shallow depth of field for portrait work
OM System brand less recognised than Canon or Sony for those coming from phones

FAQ

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

Is the Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the extra cost?

Yes — Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera scores higher at 9.5/10 vs 8.9/10.

Who is the Canon EOS R5 Mark II best suited to?

45MP full-frame, 30fps, eye-control AF, 8K RAW video. The do-everything professional hybrid.

Who is the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV best suited to?

20MP Micro 4/3, 5-axis IBIS, 4K video, flip screen, compact. Best travel mirrorless under £700.

What are the main downsides of each?

Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera: Premium professional pricing; 8K video can stress cards and generate heat in long takes. OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: Micro 4/3 sensor smaller than APS-C — lower light performance than Sony or Fujifilm at equivalent ISO; Smaller sensor limits shallow depth of field for portrait work.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Canon EOS R5 Mark II Full-Frame Camera sits at 4.8★ from 900 verified Amazon owners, and OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at 4.5★ from 2,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.