CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask vs Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

9.1/10 Excellent

4.3★ (6,800 owners)

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Full Review

Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (11,200 owners)

The Dyson Airwrap challenger. Same Coanda concept, half the price, genuine advantages on curly hair.

Full Review

At a Glance

	CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask	Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (6,800)	4.4★ (11,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Warranty	2 years	1 year

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.7/10. 633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home. That said, the Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System is worth considering if The Dyson Airwrap challenger. Same Coanda concept, half the price, genuine advantages on curly hair. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

FDA-cleared wavelengths (633nm red + 830nm near-infrared) are the clinically proven light therapy wavelengths
Flexible silicone mask contours to face for consistent LED contact across all skin areas
10-minute sessions produce measurable collagen stimulation within 4 weeks
Near-infrared penetrates deeper tissue layers than surface-only red LED devices
Independently tested results match 80% of in-clinic LED facials at 10% of the cost

£300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology
10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results
Flexible mask storage requires care — creasing affects LED alignment

Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System

Direct Airwrap competitor at significantly lower price
Flexible neck is a genuine innovation — more control than Airwrap
Often outperforms Airwrap on thick, curly or coarse hair
Wavy and curly barrel attachments both included
Widely available with straightforward returns policy

Coanda effect slightly less refined — needs more user skill
Heavier than the Dyson Airwrap at 1.1kg
Fewer attachments than the Airwrap Complete set

FAQ

Which is better, CurrentBody Skin LED or Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air?

Is the CurrentBody Skin LED worth the extra cost?

Yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.7/10.

Who is the CurrentBody Skin LED best suited to?

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Who is the Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air best suited to?

The Dyson Airwrap challenger. Same Coanda concept, half the price, genuine advantages on curly hair.

What are the main downsides of each?

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask: £300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology; 10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results. Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System: Coanda effect slightly less refined — needs more user skill; Heavier than the Dyson Airwrap at 1.1kg.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask sits at 4.3★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark FlexStyle HD430 Air Styling System at 4.4★ from 11,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.