CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask vs Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000 (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

9.1/10 Excellent

4.3★ (6,800 owners)

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Full Review

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (14,800 owners)

Patented sonic technology, 4 modes, 3 intensities. The whitening-focused electric toothbrush.

Full Review

At a Glance

	CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask	Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.8/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (6,800)	4.5★ (14,800)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Warranty	2 years	2 years

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10. 633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home. That said, the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000 is worth considering if Patented sonic technology, 4 modes, 3 intensities. The whitening-focused electric toothbrush. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

FDA-cleared wavelengths (633nm red + 830nm near-infrared) are the clinically proven light therapy wavelengths
Flexible silicone mask contours to face for consistent LED contact across all skin areas
10-minute sessions produce measurable collagen stimulation within 4 weeks
Near-infrared penetrates deeper tissue layers than surface-only red LED devices
Independently tested results match 80% of in-clinic LED facials at 10% of the cost

£300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology
10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results
Flexible mask storage requires care — creasing affects LED alignment

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000

Patented DiamondClean brush head delivers 31,000 brush strokes per minute
Verified whitening results in 1 week — tested against other premium models
4 cleaning modes including Deep Clean and Tongue Care
Glass induction charging — no plug required, charges through glass
BrushSync technology detects which head is attached and adjusts settings

No AI brushing recognition like Oral-B iO Series 9
Premium pricing without the coaching technology of the iO Series
Replacement DiamondClean heads cost more than standard Sonicare heads

FAQ

Which is better, CurrentBody Skin LED or Philips Sonicare 9000?

Is the CurrentBody Skin LED worth the extra cost?

Yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.8/10.

Who is the CurrentBody Skin LED best suited to?

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Who is the Philips Sonicare 9000 best suited to?

Patented sonic technology, 4 modes, 3 intensities. The whitening-focused electric toothbrush.

What are the main downsides of each?

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask: £300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology; 10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results. Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000: No AI brushing recognition like Oral-B iO Series 9; Premium pricing without the coaching technology of the iO Series.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask sits at 4.3★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000 at 4.5★ from 14,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.