CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask vs FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

9.1/10 Excellent

4.3★ (6,800 owners)

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Full Review

FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (4,200 owners)

Silicone T-Sonic pulses, app skin analysis, 16 intensities, 600 uses per charge, antibacterial. The cleansing device.

Full Review

At a Glance

	CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask	FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (6,800)	4.5★ (4,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Material	Flexible silicone	Antibacterial silicone

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask: 633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home. FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device: Silicone T-Sonic pulses, app skin analysis, 16 intensities, 600 uses per charge, antibacterial. The cleansing device. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask

FDA-cleared wavelengths (633nm red + 830nm near-infrared) are the clinically proven light therapy wavelengths
Flexible silicone mask contours to face for consistent LED contact across all skin areas
10-minute sessions produce measurable collagen stimulation within 4 weeks
Near-infrared penetrates deeper tissue layers than surface-only red LED devices
Independently tested results match 80% of in-clinic LED facials at 10% of the cost

£300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology
10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results
Flexible mask storage requires care — creasing affects LED alignment

FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device

T-Sonic pulsations cleanse deeper than hands while being gentle on skin
Silicone is naturally antibacterial — far more hygienic than nylon brush alternatives
App-based skin analysis personalises cleansing routines
600 uses per single charge — months of daily use between charges
16 intensity levels suit sensitive through resilient skin types

Premium pricing vs manual cleansing
App dependency for personalised routines
Benefits subtle for those with already-good cleansing habits

FAQ

Which is better, CurrentBody Skin LED or FOREO LUNA 4 Facial?

Is the CurrentBody Skin LED worth the extra cost?

Yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the CurrentBody Skin LED best suited to?

633nm red + 830nm near-infrared, flexible mask, 10-min sessions, FDA cleared. Clinical LED at home.

Who is the FOREO LUNA 4 Facial best suited to?

Silicone T-Sonic pulses, app skin analysis, 16 intensities, 600 uses per charge, antibacterial. The cleansing device.

What are the main downsides of each?

CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask: £300+ is a premium investment for at-home skincare technology; 10-minute daily commitment is required for sustained results. FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device: Premium pricing vs manual cleansing; App dependency for personalised routines.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask sits at 4.3★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and FOREO LUNA 4 Facial Cleansing Device at 4.5★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.